WHY ROBBING TAG AND REGISTRATION FEES FOR ROAD REPAIR MEANS WORSE
HIGHWAYS
(Response to 2-23-06 ARDMOREITE editorial published 3-2-06)
The Sunday Ardmoreite's unsigned editorial lauding state legislative
robbery
of tag and registration fees for road maintenance begs explanation.
Every time the Oklahoma Department of Transportation has gotten more
money
over the last 25 years, the statewide road system has gotten worse, not
better.
Each time, the new funding was overwhelmingly taken -- not from the
chief
damage source, commercial trucking -- but from the driving public. Why
should
repeating that pattern be expected to yield different results?
Fuel taxation is designed to maintain highways. Why? There's an obvious
tie
between fuel burn and road use. Unfortunately, to curry favor with the
trucking
lobby, past legislators have sabotaged the baseline, guaranteeing that
truck
operators pay far less than their share. Trucking pays only about 22%
of total
state fuel tax revenues. A standard semi operating at its maximum legal
weight inflicts pavement damage equivalent to 9,600 automobiles, yet in
Oklahoma,
that rig has paid 3 cents per gallon less state fuel tax than the
automobile
pays since 1987. Why don't legislators fix that before they tap other
revenue
streams?
Trucking pays only about 9% of total state tag and registration fee
revenues,
which are actually motor vehicle property tax, never meant for road
upkeep.
Experienced state legislators should recognize that using these funds
for road
maintenance forces the driving public to pay an even larger share of
truck-inflicted damage costs, assuring worse roads in the future. Why?
Freed from a
larger share of its highway cost responsibility, trucking uses money it
should
have had to repay taxpayers for road use to buy more trucks. By the end
of the
1990s, truck volume on state roads was growing at 45% per year - but
that's a
"good thing" as some legislators have seen it. It keeps their highway
contractor friends very busy, paid for, of course, by the taxpayers.
Why is more such
irresponsibility acceptable?
It's simple: Until each road user accurately repays, nothing will
change.
Oklahoma must have an accurate study of highway user costs to establish
definitively what each user now pays versus what should be paid. That
data should then
be used to reform the highway user fee system, ensuring fair cost
recovery.
Why should each road user not be called on to fairly repay?
It's not hard to see how a freshman legislator might be influenced to
think
tapping other funds for road repair is a good idea -- but why would
seasoned
news people, presumably always looking for the story behind the story,
be so
willing to sign off on such bad policy?
TOM ELMORE
North American Transportation Institute
PO Box 6617
OKC, OK 73153-0617
Tel: 405 794 7163
Fax: 405 799 2641
gtelmore@advancedtransport.org
www.advancedtransport.org
_____________________________________________
Bill Ensures Money for Roads, Bridges
SUNDAY ARDMOREITE Editorial
2-23-06
It appears the Oklahoma Legislature is finally addressing the horrible
condition of the state's roads and bridges.
A supplememtal funding bill that was approved Thursday devotes $100
million
to replace bridges on the state highway system and $25 million for
county
bridges.
Now the Legislature needs to take the next step by making sure a bill
by Rep.
Jeff Hickman becomes law.
The measure redirects money Oklahomans pay for car tags and taxes from
the
state's general revenue fund to construction and maintenance for
Oklahoma's
roads and bridges.
The Department of Transportation says Oklahoma has 3,350 miles of
highways
rated in inadequate or critical condition. Also, 1,156 bridges are
structurally deficient and functionally obsolete.
About $221 million in vehicle taxes is diverted from roads and bridges
to the
general revenue fund for politicians to spend on anything.
The Legislature has, over the years, designated certain revenue streams
for
certain items and it makes perfect sense to use car tag fees and taxes
to help
maintain the state's roads and bridges.
Good roads and bridges will save lives and cut down on drivers'
maintenance
costs. Good roads and bridges are also a key economic development
tool.
Hickman's bill, which was approved by the House Transportation
Committee,
makes perfect sense and should become law.
Back to oklp.org